|
Post by Robo on Nov 21, 2016 20:23:29 GMT
Well it would appear that there are many rules!
|
|
|
Post by Zed on Nov 21, 2016 20:29:39 GMT
Well it would appear that there are many rules! mostly boils down to have some respect and don't be a twat?
|
|
|
Post by Robo on Nov 21, 2016 20:42:41 GMT
Well it would appear that there are many rules! mostly boils down to have some respect and don't be a twat? Indeed it does fella 👍🏻
|
|
|
Post by rickyrooo1 on Nov 21, 2016 20:44:09 GMT
I suppose we need to all keep an eye on posts then, especially from members not directly known to us incase of espionage ? Are the warnings limitless? I.e they complain and you can pull the offending or can they pull the whole forum instantly?
|
|
|
Post by topbananaracing on Nov 21, 2016 20:50:21 GMT
Well I've read the rules. It's all a bit vague and would depend on the point of view of the person reading. I refer back to the N word from last week. It's about perspective but I'm pretty sure we can keep within the guidelines. Steve, did they actually say exactly what it is that was wrong?
|
|
|
Post by Zed on Nov 21, 2016 21:27:16 GMT
Well I've read the rules. It's all a bit vague and would depend on the point of view of the person reading. I refer back to the N word from last week. It's about perspective but I'm pretty sure we can keep within the guidelines. Steve, did they actually say exactly what it is that was wrong? If you read the message, they describe, provide an example for clarity and suggest there may be others. There is no way to reply to the PM.
|
|
|
Post by topbananaracing on Nov 22, 2016 0:08:44 GMT
Well I've read the rules. It's all a bit vague and would depend on the point of view of the person reading. I refer back to the N word from last week. It's about perspective but I'm pretty sure we can keep within the guidelines. Steve, did they actually say exactly what it is that was wrong? If you read the message, they describe, provide an example for clarity and suggest there may be others. There is no way to reply to the PM. Yes, I can see that, however the example for clarity has been removed or the link worketh not. Bit of a bummer not being able to reply or ask but "their site, their rules". 😇
|
|
|
Post by physiopro on Nov 22, 2016 6:36:14 GMT
Terms and conditions could be interpreted as no inflammatory, racist or pornographic images videos or text! 😳 what was the example?
|
|
|
Post by rickyrooo1 on Nov 22, 2016 6:43:45 GMT
Terms and conditions could be interpreted as no inflammatory, racist or pornographic images videos or text! 😳 what was the example? The Rachel Riley pic
|
|
|
Post by crispy on Nov 22, 2016 6:54:42 GMT
Terms and conditions could be interpreted as no inflammatory, racist or pornographic images videos or text! 😳 what was the example? The Rachel Riley pic I missed that one can you repost?
|
|
|
Post by physiopro on Nov 22, 2016 7:01:53 GMT
Terms and conditions could be interpreted as no inflammatory, racist or pornographic images videos or text! 😳 what was the example? The Rachel Riley pic So probably more concerned about others sueing rather than derogatory comments images within the group!
|
|
|
Post by Keith.H on Nov 22, 2016 7:19:43 GMT
She had a see through ish dress
|
|
|
Post by sANDYbAY on Nov 22, 2016 7:39:24 GMT
Did someone complain then? I was just outside having a fag and it occurred to me to wonder how they knew. They obviously can't read every reply to every post on every forum so I wondered if there's a "naughty picture robot" program they use. Actually I don't know. But I do know you'd like this idea to fail, unless you're a sudden convert. I can see a list of attachments, but neither that nor sheilseys IRA contribution was on it. It seems after all that I will have to police proboards rules or the site is toast. It might be a good idea if some of you had a read of their rules. Way out of order Steve, have you become so thin skinned that you're interpreting a little harmless teasing from me as a desire to bring down your site? Edit. I'd also like to state for the record that I had no part at all in the Rachael Riley affair, and I feel a bit miffed that I even feel the need to defend myself.
|
|
|
Post by fruitcake on Nov 22, 2016 8:15:07 GMT
I posted one of the pics, apologies and lesson learnt!
|
|
|
Post by oscar on Nov 22, 2016 8:28:39 GMT
Its early days yet. There'll probably be a few more of these warnings until the forum finds its natural level. So long as its dealt with sensibly and within proboards time limit it'll be fine.
|
|